Revelation 20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
It pain's me to have to write this blog because as anyone who reads my blog on a regular basis knows, I have posted more than a few of Steven Anderson's Youtube videos (All taken down now). Up until recently I would have endorsed him as a good bible teacher even though I totally disagree with him over his futurist interpretation of the book of Revelation. I gave him the benefit of the doubt because he was raised an Independent Fundamentalist Baptist and heavily brainwashed by countless hours of futurist/Darbyist theological preaching and teaching. Also the fact that he has seen his way out of the vast majority of Darby's errors, one of which the film After The Tribulation exposes. Namely the pre-tribulation rapture of which the film dose a very good job of debunking in the first half of the film. But sadly because of the futurist theme of the second half the film it dose not present the Biblical truth of the true identity of the Man of Sin, namely the office of the Pope. As I've discussed many times before futurism is a Jesuit invented doctrine that was invented to hide the identity of the Pope being the Antichrist which was revealed during the reformation.
Below you can see an image shown during the film. Alex Jones got a very nice product placement for his web site in the film after the tribulation and Jones and Rob Dew were also thanked in the credits.
It seems very odd to me that the symbol and T-shirt used in the product placement was actually a symbol for Satan. Is the film maker Paul Wittenberger trying to tell us something? Ether way it is the appearance of evil and the serpent should not be used as a symbol of marketing during a supposedly Christian film. But the fact remains that the lies of the devil are contained in the film by the promotion of the Jesuit invented futurist dogma, that hides the identity of the Pope as the Man of Sin.
Below you can see an image shown during the film. Alex Jones got a very nice product placement for his web site in the film after the tribulation and Jones and Rob Dew were also thanked in the credits.
It seems very odd to me that the symbol and T-shirt used in the product placement was actually a symbol for Satan. Is the film maker Paul Wittenberger trying to tell us something? Ether way it is the appearance of evil and the serpent should not be used as a symbol of marketing during a supposedly Christian film. But the fact remains that the lies of the devil are contained in the film by the promotion of the Jesuit invented futurist dogma, that hides the identity of the Pope as the Man of Sin.
If you invert the serpent
and then turn it on it's side you can see it's actual
LINK To After The Tribulation on Youtube
666
LINK To After The Tribulation on Youtube
The below article proves that Alex Jones is a disinfo agent that has close connection with a CIA front group called Stratfor.
Alternative Media King Hires CIA–Stratfor Agent as Publishing Editor In Chief
Prominent radio host, Pete Santilli, of the Pete Santilli Show, relayed sourced information to me to assist in the creation of this article. You can listen to his broadcast of his show here. Pete and I collaborated on this article to bring factual and sourced information that has been vetted and is absolutely verifiable.
Molly Maroney is the Editor in Chief and Graphic Designer for InfoWars.com. This is the same website run by Alex Jones; who also runs PrisonPlanet.com, PrisonPlanet.tv and PlanetInfoWars.com (a social networking site).
Maroney was hired by Jones in July of this year to run the new endeavor of the Free Speech, LLC outfit known as the InfoWars magazine. Prior to this employment, while living in Austin, Texas, Maroney was a freelance graphic designer. However, this is the boring part of Maroney’s employment career.

In 2008, for less than a year, Maroney worked for the privately held marketing and advertising firm known as Grant Harrison Advertising. This company “is a full service marketing company specializing in graphic design, internet marketing, and search engine optimization services (SEO), branding, and social media exposure.”Maroney’s resume is very telling about her connections to Stratfor, the CIA and her role at InfoWars.com.
They have branches throughout Texas, including in Houston, Austin and Dallas.
For seven months in 2010, Maroney was employed by Parker Media, LLCwhich is a media production corporation. Also employed at Parker Media is Richard Parker, founder of the firm. Parker, the founder, “is both an award-winning journalist and a seasoned publishing executive; he is the former associate editor of The New Republic. Today, Parker Media’s clients include some of the biggest names in news and publishing, such as CQ-Roll Call, an Economist Group company, News Corp., CanWest Global Communications, as well as start-ups and their investors.”
Interestingly, Richard Parker’s name came up when WikiLeaks released documentation known as “The Global Intelligence Files” wherein “over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered ‘global intelligence’ companyStratfor ” was made public. These emails outlined how Stratfor, an intelligence publishing front for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), provided comprehensive intelligence for such corporations and US government agencies as:
• Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co.
• Lockheed Martin
• Northrop Grumman
• Raytheon
• Department of Homeland Security
• US Marine Corp
• US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
• Lockheed Martin
• Northrop Grumman
• Raytheon
• Department of Homeland Security
• US Marine Corp
• US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
Startfor was involved in “selling” intelligence from informers, pay-off informants, money laundering schemes and psychological methods facilitated sourced and often raw intelligence.
The founder of Stratfor, Dr. George Friedman, has admitted that he is a Zionist.
On a list of recipients of those communications was Richard Parker, founder of Parker Media – and former boss of Maroney during her employment at Parker Media, LLC.
Richard Parker himself worked for Strator an executive editor between August 1999 and August 2002.
Maroney authored a white paper with Parker entitled, “China, Cyber Espionage and US National Security” that entails how the US government can minimize “widespread business loss and government data” against the Chinese with regard to cyber espionage and cyber – attacks. This document is meant to be a “political, military and strategic” report. It is based on “intelligence gathering” with particular focus on the “proficiency in network warfare” and the modernization of potential digital wars. Maroney affirms that the US must become a leader in cybersecurity to protect national digital security against foreign nations.
From her dealings with Parker Media, Maroney became an “intern” for Stratfor. She was at the CIA – front intelligence collecting corporation for 11 months; between October 2009 and August 2010. In fact, Maroney’s employment at Parker Media and Stratfor intersected as she was working for Parker Media during the same time she was involved with Stratfor.
As Maroney was finishing her internship with Stratfor, she began working with the Texas Senate under Senator John Witmire. Witmire currently serves as Chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, member of the Senate Government Organization Committee and the Senate Finance Committee where he is involved with finalizing funding appropriations for Texas state agencies and governmental programs.
There have been suspicionsthat Jones has been corrupted and is working with Stratfor. Jones was making the same predictions about the events surrounding 9/11. Jones also has questionable guests who provide misinformation cloaked as intelligence like CFR member Steve Pechenik, David MacMichael and Ray McGovern from the CIA, James Wesley Rawles from the Army Intelligence.
Jones’ own privacy policy on his website, PlanetInfoWars states that:
- 3.2. “we may use your personal identifying information” “when complying with an order” from “..other government entity…”
- 3.4. “We us cookies, log files, and third parties to create a profile of our users and the information gathered is personally identifiable as belonging to you…”
- 3.7. Any information you disclosed to third parties on our Website or other websites becomes public information, and you should exercise caution when deciding to disclose any personal information.
When a user visits the InfoWars, PrisonPlanet or PlanetInfoWars websites, they are inundated with a Trojan Cookie that “maliciously tracks” the movement of the user across the internet. In effect, all of your web surfing is tracked by Jones – every other website you visit, login information, digital data.
This is information that is very useful to Stratfor. Having information about users that frequent the websites owned by Jones can be turned over to Stratfor for intelligence gathering purposes and is extremely valuable to a CIA operation that is trying access the temperament of the general public.
Through Maroney, Jones can benefit from protection by a CIA operation. Continue Reading........
Anyway to make a long story short, I contacted Steven on the 14th of January and asked him if Alex Jones had put up some of the money for the production of the film and I warned him that Alex Jones had CIA/Stratfor and Jesuit connections. I literally copied and pasted the above article and this one into the body of the e-mail just in case he was lazy and wouldn't follow a link. This was his response:
As you can imagine that was not the answer I was looking for, so I sent him even more information on Alex Jones proving that he is in fact a false teacher and a Judas who preaches a false New Age Gospel. I again copied and pasted the best article I could find exposing Alex Jones and his New Age Agenda and I'll bet you guessed by now I got absolutely no response. Why didn't I get a response? There are a few possible answers to that question, 1. as revealed in Steven response above: "MONEY" Paul Wittenberger wants to sell his DVD's on the CIA info gathering web site infowars.com and no amount of evidence that Jones is a Judas will make a tap of difference because the love of money has blinded both Steven and Paul OR 2. Both Steven and Paul are both also CIA/Jesuit disinfo Agents.
If option one is correct then shame on them both, that they would endorse and fellowship with Alex Jones for the purposes of making money. Just so it is clear for anyone reading this blog that Alex Jones is a Judas please see these blogs that I have posted on the topic.
Really Hope option two is not the case, but at the very least it is an endorsement and fellowship with a CIA propaganda alternative media gatekeeper and Steven and Paul are very deceived.
Recently I found this video interview that Steven did promoting the American Constitution Party. Given my Biblical point of view that Christians are called out of this world to be separate from the beasts kingdom and it's political machinations, I decided to check out the background of this party to see who was behind it. I was shocked to find that Steven is endorsing a party that is based on the teachings of Calvinism, given the fact that Steven preaches so strongly against Calvinism it is further evidence that Steven speaks out of both sides of his mouth when ever the situation suits him. Which makes him a double minded man and a hypocrite, I again e-mailed the bellow Wiki articles to him and again I got no answer. That is the last time I will e-mail Steven unless he repents.
James 1:8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
Matthew 7:5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Bellow you can see for yourself that it only takes a few clicks on the Wikipedia to find out that the Constitution Party is a Christian Reconstructionist/Calvinist political movement.
Constitution Party (United States)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Constitution Party is a right-wing political party in the United States. It was founded as the U.S. Taxpayers' Party by Howard Philips in 1991.[1] Phillips was the party's candidate in the 1992, 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. The party's official name was changed to The Constitution Party in 1999; however, some state affiliate parties are known under different names. The party's platform defines itself as predicated on the principles of the nation's founding documents.[2] The party currently puts a large focus onimmigration, calling for stricter penalties towards illegal immigrants and a moratorium on legal immigration until all federal subsidies to immigrants are discontinued.[3] The party absorbed the American Independent Party, originally founded for George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign. The American Independent Party of California has been an affiliate of the Constitution Party since its founding; however, current party leadership is disputed and the issue is in court to resolve this conflict. The Constitution Party has some substantial support from the Christian Right and in 2010 achieved major party status in Colorado.
Howard Phillips (politician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Howard Phillips (born February 6, 1941) is a three-time United States presidential candidate who has served as the chairman of The Conservative Caucus, a conservative public policy advocacy group founded in 1974.
Personal life
Jewish by birth and a native of Boston, Massachusetts, Phillips converted to evangelical Christianity in adulthood[1] and has been associated with Christian Reconstructionism.
Continue Reading.....
Christian Reconstructionism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the Protestant movement. For other uses, see Reconstructionism (disambiguation).
Christian Reconstructionism is a Calvinist theonomic movement, founded by Rousas John Rushdoony, that some claim has played a role in promoting the trend toward explicitly Christian politics in the larger U.S. Christian Right.[1] Christian Reconstructionists are usually postmillennialists and followers of the presuppositional apologetics of Cornelius Van Til. They tend to support a decentralized political order resulting in laissez-faire capitalism.[2]
Reconstructionist perspective
[edit]Theonomy
Main article: Theonomy
Christian Reconstructionists describe their view of public ethics by the term, "Theonomy" (the Law of God governs); while some of their critics tend to label them "Theocratic" (God governs). The notable differences are that "theocracy" is usually thought of as totalitarian and involving no distinction between church and state, while Reconstructionists claim that "theonomy" is broadly libertarian and maintains a distinction of sphere of authority between family, church, and state.[3] For example, enforcement of moral sanctions under theonomy is done by family and church government, and sanctions for moral offenses is outside the authority of civil government (which is limited to criminal matters, courts and national defense). However, these distinctions become blurred, as the application of theonomy typically increases the authority of the civil government; prominent advocates of Christian Reconstructionism have written that according to their understanding, God's law approves of the death penalty not only for murder, but also for propagators of all forms of idolatry,[4][5][6] active homosexuals,[7] adulterers, practitioners of witchcraft, and blasphemers,[8] and perhaps even recalcitrant youths[9] (see the List of capital crimes in the Bible).
American Vision's Joel McDurmon responded to these criticisms:
What reconstructionist has promoted “coercive” means? This is the same criticism that comes from men like Horton and T. David Gordon – that Reconstructionists want to steal seats of power and install an American Taliban (the same rhetoric that I have witnessed over and over from atheists Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens). If this is not an uneducated misrepresentation, it is a lie.[10]
Conversely, Christian Reconstructionism's founder, Rousas John Rushdoony, wrote in The Institutes of Biblical Law (the founding document of reconstructionsim), that Old Testament law should be applied to modern society and advocates the reinstatement of the Mosaic law's penal sanctions. Under such a system, the list of civil crimes which carried a death sentence would include homosexuality, adultery, incest, lying about one's virginity, bestiality, witchcraft, idolatry or apostasy, public blasphemy, false prophesying, kidnapping, rape, and bearing false witness in a capital case.
Rousas John Rushdoony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rousas John Rushdoony (April 25, 1916 – February 8, 2001) was a Calvinist philosopher, historian, and theologian and is widely credited as the father of Christian Reconstructionism and an inspiration for the modern Christian homeschool movement.[1][2] His followers and critics have argued that his thought exerts considerable influence on the Christian right.[3]
The Institutes of Biblical Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Institutes of Biblical Law is a book by Rousas John Rushdoony, published in 1973. It is the first volume of a three-volume work, also referred to by the same title, which is modeled after Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion.
The Institutes of Biblical Law expounds the Ten Commandments, adopting a theonomic perspective. John Frame notes that the major thesis of the book is that "almost all of the Old Testament civil law is literally normative for civil governments today."[1]
The Institutes of Biblical Law is a major work in Christian Reconstructionism. It provides an outline of a program for establishing a Christian theocracy.[2] Joe Bageant suggests that if the United States experiences a fourth "Great Awakening", historians may one day "document it as beginning in 1973 with the publication of R. J. Rushdoony's seminal The Institutes of Biblical Law."[3]
Cornelius Van Til
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cornelius Van Til (May 3, 1895 – April 17, 1987) was a Christian philosopher, Reformed theologian, and presuppositional apologist.
Biography
Van Til (born Kornelis van Til in Grootegast, Netherlands) was the sixth son of Ite van Til, a dairy farmer, and his wife Klasina van der Veen.[1] At the age of ten, he moved with his family to Highland, Indiana. He was the first of his family to receive a higher education. In 1914 he attended Calvin Preparatory School, graduated from Calvin College, and attended one year at Calvin Theological Seminary, where he studied under Louis Berkhof, but he transferred to Princeton Theological Seminary and later graduated with his PhD from Princeton University.
He began teaching at Princeton Seminary, but shortly went with the conservative group that founded Westminster Theological Seminary, where he taught for forty-three years of his life. He taught apologetics and systematic theology there until his retirement in 1972 and continued to teach occasionally until 1979. He was also a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church from the 1930s until his death in 1987, and in that denomination, he was embroiled in a bitter dispute with Gordon Clark over God's incomprehensibilityknown as the Clark-Van Til Controversy in which, according to Van Til's pupil John Frame, neither man was at his best and neither quite understood the other's position.
Bellow you can watch Steven preach against Calvinism in theology but yet he openly endorses it as a political system. That's just hypocritical if you ask me.

